Post by rajiyakhatun406 on Feb 12, 2024 4:59:17 GMT
In order to adapt our legal system to the European Framework Decisions and Directives on the criminal liability of legal entities, our legislator modified the Penal Code through Organic Law 5/2010, of June 22 . Until that moment, our legislative system only established some accessory consequences, provided for in article 129 of the Penal Code, to condemn people, with or without legal personality, whose administrator was the author of one of the Criminally Typed .In short, the Chamber continues, the comparison of the statements of the complainant and the accused with the results of the rest of the tests performed does not show any error on the part of the sentencing court in the evaluation of the evidence performed.
In the present study it is necessary to start from what is understood by closure of premises or establishments, which according to the Dictionary Ecuador Email List of the Royal Academy would be the “penalty applicable to legal entities for the commission of a criminal offense that restricts their activity in the legal traffic of the places where it is carried out .” The penalty imposed on legal entities is an , deprivation or restrictive sanction of rights or corporate freedom. In order for us to be able to talk about criminal liability of legal entities, the requirements required in article 31 bis CP must be met.
There is a general catalog of specific penalties that may be imposed on the legal entity in article 33.7 CP, with its own determination rules in article 66 bis CP. Regarding jurisdiction, we have to refer to the general rules of the (territorial and objective jurisdiction) as there is no specific procedure. The same occurs with respect to the execution of Sentences, having to resort again to the general rules. There was no consent For the Civil and Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court, the complainant's statement does not contain "spurious" motives, but rather offers " a concrete, consistent, detailed and coherent story . The Court concludes that it does not observe in the appealed judgment errors of valuation or inaccurate assessments that lead to wrong inferences.
In the present study it is necessary to start from what is understood by closure of premises or establishments, which according to the Dictionary Ecuador Email List of the Royal Academy would be the “penalty applicable to legal entities for the commission of a criminal offense that restricts their activity in the legal traffic of the places where it is carried out .” The penalty imposed on legal entities is an , deprivation or restrictive sanction of rights or corporate freedom. In order for us to be able to talk about criminal liability of legal entities, the requirements required in article 31 bis CP must be met.
There is a general catalog of specific penalties that may be imposed on the legal entity in article 33.7 CP, with its own determination rules in article 66 bis CP. Regarding jurisdiction, we have to refer to the general rules of the (territorial and objective jurisdiction) as there is no specific procedure. The same occurs with respect to the execution of Sentences, having to resort again to the general rules. There was no consent For the Civil and Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court, the complainant's statement does not contain "spurious" motives, but rather offers " a concrete, consistent, detailed and coherent story . The Court concludes that it does not observe in the appealed judgment errors of valuation or inaccurate assessments that lead to wrong inferences.